Strategy

What is Strategy? Thoughts from a Former Bain Consultant

Updated: Jan 27, 2025
What is Strategy? Thoughts from a Former Bain Consultant
DISCLAIMER OF AFFILIATION: Slideworks is an independent entity and is not affiliated or endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with BCG, McKinsey or Bain. All references to these companies are for informational or comparative purposes only and does not imply any association with or endorsement by the aforementioned companies.

After spending more than a decade working with Fortune 500 companies, I've noticed that "strategy" is one of those terms that gets thrown around a lot in business - often without a common understanding of what it actually means. Some people equate strategy with detailed plans and initiatives, others feel strategy is more about high-level goal-setting, while still others believe it is a one-time effort at the beginning of the strategy cycle to identify competitive advantages. 
In this blog post, I want to cut through the confusion and share my perspective on what strategy really means in business, why it matters, discuss how strategy is different from a plan along with other common misconceptions, and finally go through the five tests of a good strategy.


What is strategy?

At its core, strategy is about making clear choices that position your organization to win in the market. It's not just about what you choose to do – it's equally about what you explicitly choose not to do. 
During my time at Bain, I observed that the companies and teams that struggled the most were often those trying to be everything to everyone, while the most successful ones had crystal clear answers to three fundamental questions:

  • Where do we play? (Which markets, customers, and opportunities do we pursue?)
  • How do we win? (What unique value do we offer to beat the competition?)
  • ​​What does winning look like to us? (What is our goal?)

Great strategists were equally able to answer the negatives of those questions, i.e., “...and where do we not play?”, “...what will we not focus on?”, “...how do we know that we’re failing?”.

These three questions (and their negative counterparts) form the basis of a strategy. The answers should feed into a discussion of the business model and how your company will act or position itself in each part of the business model. This in turn will beget a series of initiatives to bring the company into that position, and the initiatives should then be prioritized and mapped into a timeline to understand how realistic and easy they will be to implement.

All of the above together form a strategy. Exactly where strategy stops and tactics begin is a matter of opinion, but it is undeniable that any strategy is incomplete without clear answers to the above questions.

The legendary BCG founder Bruce Henderson captured this essence perfectly when he wrote that strategy requires "the ability to foresee the future consequences of present initiatives." Strategy is about making deliberate choices today that shape your competitive position tomorrow.

Get inspiration for putting together a best-practice strategy presentation in our Business Strategy template

Get inspiration for putting together a best-practice strategy presentation in our Business Strategy template

Why is strategy important in business?

In the hectic environment of everyday business operations, taking time to think through and put a strategy on paper can seem like a time-sucking effort with little immediate impact on the top- and bottom-line. Executives can sometimes feel that the company strategy is clear enough and doesn’t need to be explicitly stated.

However, the graveyard of failed businesses is littered with companies that lacked a clear and deliberate strategy. Almost invariably, the clarity and execution of a strategy is what separates winners from losers.

To be more specific, here’s why a good strategy is paramount to succeed:
 

1. Framework for resource allocation

As Michael Porter, one of the grandfathers of modern strategy thinking, writes: “The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do”


A good strategy acts as a practical framework for making decisions on how to allocate resources on a day-to-day, month-to-month, and year-to-year basis. If you have outlined what you want to focus on, what is important to build your competitive advantage, and how this flows into initiatives, people, and organizational structures then it’s easy to say “yes” or “no” when faced with requests for money or people for new projects and changes.


 

Conversely, a bad strategy or no strategy at all leaves managers and employees without this clear framework and more often than not too many projects and initiatives are started, teams lose focus, and the march toward improving competitive positions is slowed.

 

2. Yardstick for measuring progress

A good strategy also means there is a clear goal and an explicit and congruent way of measuring progress towards that goal. If you don’t have a clear picture of where you want to go it is hard to know if you’re on the right path.


However, I’ve seen many executives make the mistake of thinking that any progress is good progress when measuring success. 
An example of this was an non-profit I worked with several years ago. Here, their overall goal wasn’t maximizing profit or top-line, but instead helping as many children in need as they could through fundraising. But they lacked a clear strategy that defined that fundraising goal more granularly and prioritized efforts systematically. The result was that every employee was doing a myriad of fundraising projects and had no system for discerning between opportunities, leading to almost everyone feeling like they were spread too thin and little growth in funds raised. 
By translating the generic and fluffy goal of “helping as many children as possible” to a more specific and measurable goal of “getting the most funds raised”, the non-profit was able to streamline efforts, say no to fundraising projects and random ideas, and finally grow funds raised.


Many companies without strategies or with simple plans fall into the trap of setting too generic goals and miss the opportunity to maximize resources for the most effective goal. A good strategy instead allows a company to ask; are we succeeding at the right metrics?

 

3. Aligns incentives and behavior

Creating and putting a strategy on paper also forces a conversation of incentive structure. As Charlie Munger famously said: “Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the behavior”.


A strategy outlines where you want to go and how you want to get there. This cascades into the behaviors you need to foster in the organization to achieve these aims. A good example of incentives and behaviors is in a cost optimization vs. innovation situation. If your strategy shows you to be in an efficiency game where reduced prices and/or costs are the competitive advantage, then you want KPIs in place that incentivize cost cutting. This can be e.g., measuring managers on their profit margins, head count or similar. 

However, if you’re in an innovation environment where competitive advantage comes from being first or best with new technologies, products, or features, then the same cost cutting KPIs would be detrimental to success. Here instead you want employees to dare take risks to build something that might fail. You want departments to have research budgets and teams to be able to invest and follow promising leads.

 

4. Forces deliberate competitive advantage

Putting a strategy on paper forces you to articulate your playing field and your competitive advantage. It also forces everyone to agree on what your competitive advantage specifically is. Even if this can feel trivial, I’ve witnessed countless companies where executives were sure they were all in agreement and didn’t need to state their unique selling points explicitly, only to find that they all had slightly different notions of what they were once they were forced to say them out loud.

A good strategy allows you to deliberately identify, build, and iterate on your competitive advantage. And it sets up a foundation so this competitive advantage can seep into every part of the company and ensure all initiatives and actions work to enforce this advantage.

 

5. Manages risks in a cohesive way

Finally, a good strategy highlights areas of potential risks and lays out mitigation strategies for these risks. 

You may feel you have enough with just a simple risk mitigation plan, but this misses the bigger picture and means you may accidentally have individual mitigation strategies that undermine a greater goal. 

Without a strategy you are essentially flying blind in deciding which risks are worth focusing on and what different mitigation plans mean for the entire organization. Embedding risk management in a strategy allows you to correctly and intentionally rank risks and decide between mitigation initiatives.

 

How is strategy different from a plan?

One of the most common misconceptions I encountered at Bain was the equation of strategy with planning. While related, they're fundamentally different:

Strategy is about choices:

  • Determines where you will play and how you will win
  • Focuses on creating sustainable competitive advantage
  • Makes explicit trade-offs between competing priorities
  • Provides guiding principles for decision-making

Planning is about execution:

  • Details how to implement strategic choices
  • Focuses on operational effectiveness
  • Allocates resources and sets timelines
  • Provides specific action steps and metrics

As Jack Welch, legendary former CEO of General Electric, allegedly said: “Strategy is not a lengthy action plan. It is the evolution of a central idea through continually changing circumstances."

Think of it this way: strategy is deciding to climb Mount Everest from the south face during May (the what and why), while planning is working out the logistics of oxygen supplies, base camps, and Sherpa support (the how and when).

A great strategy without solid planning will fail, but planning without strategy is like efficiently executing a march in the wrong direction. You need both, but they serve different purposes.

 

Common misconceptions of strategy

As I mentioned in the beginning, strategy is one of the concepts that’s often used and almost just as often misunderstood.

From my experience, the following misconceptions are the most common:

  • Misconception: Goal setting is the same as strategy
    Reality: Goals are an inherent part of a good strategy because they act as the north star that you’re aiming towards. But goal setting is only one component of a strategy. How you are going to achieve those goals in terms of identifying your competitive position, deciding how to build your strengths and which weaknesses you are okay living with, and making sure your organization is set up to work towards those aims are equally as important.
     
  • Misconception: Strategy is long-term only (...and therefore not that relevant in the next week or two)
    Reality: A good strategy inspires immediate action in terms of reallocating resources, shifting around roadmaps, and initiating new projects. If the outcome of your strategy is not a set of initiatives and a roadmap that can (and should) be enacted tomorrow to start enforcing your competitive advantage, then your strategy is not strong enough.
     
  • Misconception: Strategy is static - once set, you can leave it as is until the next strategy cycle in x+ years
    Reality: Although some market environments are fairly stable and strategies in these environments don’t require much updating, then most companies operate in environments where technologies, customers, and competitors are changing rapidly. Here, your strategy should never be a static plan but rather a living document that responds to changing conditions. 
     
  • Misconception: Strategy means being as operationally efficient as possible
    Reality: Efficiency (doing things right) is important, but effectiveness (doing the right things) is often more strategic. This might mean forgoing short-term efficiency gains for long-term strategic positioning. A good strategy has a strong goal, definition of playing field, and identification of competitive advantage and so is able to make the trade-offs being efficiency and effectiveness in an informed manner.
     
  • Misconception: More data leads to a better strategy
    Reality: While data is invaluable, the key is in its interpretation and application. Too much data can lead to paralysis by analysis. Strategy involves making decisions under uncertainty, not just when all data points are clear.
Michael Porter's five criteria for a good strategy

Five tests of a good strategy

I’ll end this article with some practical tips, specifically Michael Porter’s five tests of a good strategy.

  1. Does your strategy define a unique value proposition compared to other organizations? 
    Are you crystal clear on where you differ from your competitors and how this adds value to your customers? Winning in the market means offering something unique and different to customers that make them choose you, be it in terms of features, price, brand etc.
     
  2. Does your strategy lead to a different, tailored value chain?
    Competitive advantage is built by doing activities differently or doing different activities than competitors which ultimately leads to the better value proposition for your customers.
     
  3. Does your strategy contain clear tradeoffs, and choosing what not to do? 
    Focus is the key to a good strategy. To offer the unique value proposition and identify and do the activities that lead to that value proposition, you need to be able to cut everything out that doesn’t inform that goal.
     
  4. Does your strategy contain activities that fit together and reinforce each other? 
    The activities that you do choose to do should sum up to more than their parts. A good strategy lays out a series of activities and initiatives that amplify each other to produce a better value proposition and reinforce the competitive advantage.
     
  5. Do you have strategic continuity with continual improvement in realizing the strategy? 
    Strategic continuity means the overall strategy doesn’t change every 6-12 months. If it changed every year, you wouldn’t have enough time to build up the value chain that led to your unique value proposition and ultimately the competitive advantage that is difficult to copy. At the same time, strategy is not static and a good strategy should be specific enough to act as the framework for saying “no”, while broad enough to adapt to changing environments and new data as you develop.

These five questions can act as the litmus test for your strategy document. Continuously ask yourself these questions and you're on a solid path to building a strong strategy.


Conclusion

Strategy isn't just an academic exercise or a document that sits on a shelf. When done right, it's a powerful tool that shapes decision-making at all levels of an organization. It provides the clarity needed to say "no" to good opportunities that don't fit, and the conviction to say "yes" to bold moves that do.

In today's complex business environment, having a clear strategy is more important than ever. It's what separates the companies that merely survive from those that truly thrive. As Bruce Henderson noted, "Strategy is a deliberate search for a plan of action that will develop a business's competitive advantage and compound it."

Whether you're leading a Fortune 500 company or a growing startup, the fundamental principles remain the same: make clear choices, focus on creating unique value, and build the capabilities needed to deliver that value better than anyone else. That's what strategy is all about.

Are you interested in learning more about strategy?